2 ms·

youtube leaves a lot to be desired from a quality stand point.

• bobmarley1 8y ago
  Yet it still has a massive first mover advantage.
  • rmah 8y ago
    Youtube wasn't even close to first -- it started in 2005. They were more like third or fourth. Youtube (and later google) got the formula and right -- they learned from the mistake the first movers made. Sort of like Facebook, Dropbox, Salesforce, Instagram, Google, etc. None of them were first. Being first is dangerous.
  • normo12 8y ago
    The advantage it had was a cavalier approach to piracy iirc. Didn't they use that to bootstrap before going legit?
• 1ba9115454 8y ago
  Funny, as I'm starting to use it more and more. If I want windsurfing, snowboarding or skateboarding tips the quality can be excellent. There are some great SEO channels and stuff for CSS Grid. Even with my son, we can get short lectures on the stuff he is studying at school.
• rawrmaan 8y ago
  I don't agree. I find the problem with YouTube is that there's too much quality content and I need to keep myself from wasting too much time on it.