3 ms·
> Theranos doesn't have anything to do with biomedical science Doesn't it? Wasn't that the main claim of the company? To have the technology that allows to do
by tralarpa 8y ago
> Theranos doesn't have anything to do with biomedical science
Doesn't it? Wasn't that the main claim of the company? To have the technology that allows to do a lot of tests with very small amounts of blood? In your description it sounds like "Theranos had a great idea, unfortunately the technology was not read", like some kind of mild inconvenience that stopped something brilliant. Like "My company wants to build flying cars based on anti-matter reactors. The technology doesn't exist but, apart from that, isn't my idea brilliant?"
- mrtksn 8y agoI think their main claim was to improve the experience and reduce the costs for the users and the medical professionals. The rest of your comment is a straw-man argument as it misrepresents my words as I never even implied that they had a great idea or tech or anything like that. Sorry I cannot defend words that are not my own.