3 ms·
> They are not independent of it, under no definition of any of those words Sure. But the words actually used were: "operating independently from", which is di
by peteretep 8y ago
> They are not independent of it, under no definition of any of those words
Sure. But the words actually used were: "operating independently from", which is different.
- matt4077 8y agoYou cannot "operate independently from" without also "being independent from". And you're just proving that bad-faith accusation, and splitting hairs into finer and finer strands.
- peteretep 8y agoI don't agree with your first comment at all, but it sounds like a particularly dull semantics argument.