4 ms·
"Published Mar 30, 2017" (I'm not complaining–it's interesting and I'll give it a try. But it's not brand new)
by matt4077 8y ago
"Published Mar 30, 2017"
(I'm not complaining–it's interesting and I'll give it a try. But it's not brand new)
- na85 8y agoWhere is the requirement that we only see "brand-new" stuff on HN?
- janimo 8y agoHacker News :)
- yjftsjthsd-h 8y agoWell, it should probably be tagged (2017).
- matt4077 8y agoThere is no such requirement, and I thought I was clear that I appreciated the post, and was merely trying to add the information. Also: the headline has "now" in it. It's not the end of the world, but I've seen correction notes on NYT etc articles for far smaller matters. It's just a general principle that true information > false information.
- willio58 8y agoWhen the title includes “now free” but it’s old news, I think it should include the year in the title