4 ms·
Nearly 2000 words on how I can police their website for them? No, thanks. If they took this problem seriously they would build a system to catch copy-paste befo
by leephillips 8y ago
Nearly 2000 words on how I can police their website for them? No, thanks. If they took this problem seriously they would build a system to catch copy-paste before it went live on their site.
- fasafsafsf 8y agoI think they already have such systems via bots, but they don't block or undo things automatically because I assume it's hard to know programmatically the licence of things that are posted on the Internet.
- mike22223333 8y agoIt it is hard, that they should not run wikipedia.
- fasafsafsf 8y agoThat is crazy. Even systems like ContentID are full of flaws.
- balp 8y agoKinda hard like the lawers are still after years trying to figure out the issue between Oracle and Google, Apple and Samsung... It's a really hard legal issue, expecting it to be easy for a computer to solve. It's naive.
- afandian 8y agoThere is no 'them'. The Wikipedia community comprises everyone who wants to participate. WMF is small in comparison.
- raverbashing 8y agoSure, the magical internet gnomes can know what every book in the world contains and detect copy paste like that. I would expect to read such an uninformed comment on Fox News comment section.