3 ms·

https://community.ubnt.com/t5/EdgeRouter/UDP-packet-loss-on-Cavium-based-routers/td-p/1343012 https://community.ubnt.com/t5/EdgeRouter/UDP-packet-loss-on-... I

by nvarsj 8y ago

https://community.ubnt.com/t5/EdgeRouter/UDP-packet-loss-on-Cavium-based-routers/td-p/1343012 https://community.ubnt.com/t5/EdgeRouter/UDP-packet-loss-on-... I was one of the people involved in some of the measurements on there. I avoid ubnt networking gear in general after that experience (although ER-X seems good and I use one at home as a smart switch). Their specialty is in APs, which work really great.

prplhaz4 8y ago
The last update of the first post says that this was fixed in v1.10.0, and the release notes concur: https://community.ubnt.com/t5/EdgeMAX-Updates-Blog/EdgeMAX-EdgeRouter-software-release-v1-10-0/ba-p/2233263 https://community.ubnt.com/t5/EdgeMAX-Updates-Blog/EdgeMAX-E...
- nvarsj 8y ago
  I knew I should have checked the release notes before commenting. No idea if it works but that would be a great improvement.
- tolien 8y ago
  Open to the idea I’ve got a different issue, but I’m still seeing an issue with 1.10.5.
tolien 8y ago
Thanks, and agreed. It was my first Ubnt gear, and I suspect it will be my last. It was so much cheaper than some of the alternatives though (that should probably have been a red flag…) but firmware that’s at best in continuous beta really isn’t good enough.