4 ms·
Just a few days ago people on HN were believing it was an asteroid. If anybody would have challenged that, they would not have been believed. My point is, peop
by some_account 8y ago
Just a few days ago people on HN were believing it was an asteroid. If anybody would have challenged that, they would not have been believed.
My point is, people believe most things, specially from space agencies, without having any means of verifying it. And they believe it without any doubt.
If I told you that these space agencies are lying to the public, would you believe it? There is so much evidence of nasa and ess fakery. It just annoys me that most people still believe anything coming from these sources.
- ss2003 8y agoDoes that mean you think it's flat?
- phyzome 8y agoMicrometeorite, not asteroid.
- SketchySeaBeast 8y ago> Just a few days ago people on HN were believing it was an asteroid. If anybody would have challenged that, they would not have been believed. Typically people do and should believe things based upon the strongest evidence. While you can't trust them to be totally right all the time, you can assume that, barring additional information and reasonable cause for doubt, that the most credible sources information is a good place to start. Do you have a source that's more credible than NASA in regards to events occurring in space with NASA astronauts?