I'm curious, can anyone update me on the related problem of whether it is still the case that failing studies are rarely published so there's a potential for d

I'm curious, can anyone update me on the related problem of whether it is still the case that failing studies are rarely published so there's a potential for duplication and misreading of significance--because if 101 studies are run and publish the one time it hit p 0.01 you got what would be expected by chance. Are the structural problems inherent in publish-or-perish mitigated in any way yet?