You know he can be wrong about some things but still make a valid point about others. How do you think this reads in relation to his primary claim about the Has

You know he can be wrong about some things but still make a valid point about others. How do you think this reads in relation to his primary claim about the Haskell community? > People who claim dynamic type systems are superior to static ones can be dismissed in much the same way flat earthers can because both choose to dismiss evidence they find inconvenient. Seriously. This only feeds into his narrative.