5 ms·
Said no one ever. https://en.cppreference.com/w/Cppreference:FAQ https://en.cppreference.com/w/Cppreference:FAQ This states that the website's contents are li
by roblabla 8y ago
Said no one ever.
https://en.cppreference.com/w/Cppreference:FAQ https://en.cppreference.com/w/Cppreference:FAQ
This states that the website's contents are licensed under CC-BY-SA and GFDL, both basically just requiring a link-back to the source. Furthermore, example implementations in reference websites are basically meant to be copy pasted. That's, like, the whole point of their existence.
- jakear 8y agoBut in the event you modify it you do have to share those modifications.
- chris_wot 8y agoIf you modify it, then it's not going to be the C++11 feature you are emulating.
- Someone 8y agoThat’s not just a link-back. Maintaining even one such text fragment across the history of a project already is hard. With every edit of the file, you’ll have to evaluate whether the gist of the original code still is there. Let’s say somebody copy-pastes half an example somewhere else. Should that have a link back, too? I think, the smaller the fragment copied, the harder this is.