3 ms·
This article is very poorly written regardless of how accurate its contents are. It seems to be based on suggestions, rumors (or rumour since it's UK based), an
by driverdan 8y ago
This article is very poorly written regardless of how accurate its contents are. It seems to be based on suggestions, rumors (or rumour since it's UK based), and a 1981 book that very few have read. No actual sources and repeated use of the word secret. Trash.
- bmn__ 8y agoPrevious article has the source. https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=16671944 https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=16671944
- Timpy 8y agoI thought this article was pretty poorly written too, and the website is a clear example of the "Bullshit Web." https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=17655089 https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=17655089 However, the number of people who have read a book published in 1981 has no bearing on the validity of the book as a source.