4 ms·
It's even worse that, long after nuclear power has lost on economic terms, the tech community still can't get over their infatuation with it. Yes, people somet
by matt4077 8y ago
It's even worse that, long after nuclear power has lost on economic terms, the tech community still can't get over their infatuation with it.
Yes, people sometimes had irrational fears. Yes, probabilities are unfortunately difficult to intuitively grasp.
But it's not safety that doomed nuclear power, quite obviously: countries such as Russia and (to a lesser degree) China care little about environmental concerns. Nuclear power is simply too expensive.
It's also surprising that the incredible improvements wind, and especially solar power have seen over the last decade or so are largely not the result of far-sighted technologists, but of the universally-despised political class: subsidising solar power production in Germany, as one example, must be among the most efficient government programs in history.
- adrianN 8y agoNobody prices in global warming into their coal plants, that's why they're cheap.
- njarboe 8y agoAll of the pollutants for nuclear power is right there on site. Its great. Coal emissions are various and many very toxic. Most are scrubbed out now in the US but not elsewhere. Fish high on the food chain in the oceans are dangerous to eat regularly due to high mercury content from coal burning. People that protest nuclear power while coal is still being burned are just anti-industry. Reading some history about the misery of life without industrial levels of power might give some perspective.