4 ms·
> Individual fitness is not independent, let alone group fitness. And without independence you are just plain wrong. Who said that fitness in my description ca
by m1el 8y ago
> Individual fitness is not independent, let alone group fitness. And without independence you are just plain wrong.
Who said that fitness in my description cannot include group fitness? The same argument goes for adding a worker to the workforce. Does the worker fit the existing workforce?
- sago 8y ago> Who said that fitness in my description cannot include group fitness? I did. Because doing so contradicts your conclusion. Though I also said it is not necessary. Lack of independence alone makes you wrong. > The same argument goes for adding a worker to the workforce. Does the worker fit the existing workforce? Which same argument? The argument you made was about filtering lowering fitness.
- m1el 8y ago> I did. Because doing so contradicts your conclusion. Going for the conclusion instead of the argument. You can't demonstrate where my reasoning is wrong, but saying that the conclusion is wrong. Congratulations, you're an ideologue.
- sago 8y ago> You can't demonstrate where my reasoning is wrong I specifically said why your argument was wrong. Without independence it is simply untrue. > Congratulations, you're an ideologue. I am. Mathematical flummery triggers me.