5 ms·

Don't you think with economic equality, 80% of females will go to top 10% of males (for free) ? While now at least they pay.

radiantswirl 8y ago
Dude be quiet you’re gonna wake the Normies up to knowledge that really won’t be useful to them and will only make them angry Of course you’re correct but SSSHHH bro!!
petra 8y ago
That's not what we see in the Nordic countries .
- ddorian43 8y ago
  What do you see there ? Women date down or equal ?
- raducu 8y ago
  If I remember correctly 23% of norwegian males under 40 are childless while only 13% of females are childless. And that is for having children; I'm sure in the "casual dating"/monopolising the most fertile/attractive years of women the top males have it much better.
  - aluren 8y ago
    I don't get it. You can't "monopolize" anyone as far as casual encounters are concerned, since they're by definition 'casual', i.e. temporary, non-exclusive, short-term, etc. Or are you implying that each man in that supposed top 10% has literally eight women waiting in line for him and abstaining from any other kind of encounter? That's a quite bold statement and not one I've verified from personal experience. But then I don't live in America?
  - TheCoelacanth 8y ago
    I would guess that is an extremely low difference compared to historic norms. 8,000 years ago, women were 17 times as likely to have children[1], your example would be about 1.13 times as likely. [1] https://psmag.com/environment/17-to-1-reproductive-success https://psmag.com/environment/17-to-1-reproductive-success
meowface 8y ago
Are you saying 80% or more of women don't want monogamous relationships?
- ddorian43 8y ago
  They will go for several rides with beautiful/wealthy men until they settle down for a normal joe full of resentment.
- raducu 8y ago
  I think he's saying 80% of women want monogamous relationships with the top 10% of men :)
  - radiantswirl 8y ago
    No, he’s saying 100% of women want relationships with the top 10% of men. Because that’s just reality
TheCoelacanth 8y ago
Historically, it has been the opposite. Polygamy has usually coincided with extreme inequality.

radiantswirl 8y ago

Dude be quiet you’re gonna wake the Normies up to knowledge that really won’t be useful to them and will only make them angry Of course you’re correct but SSSHHH bro!!

petra 8y ago

That's not what we see in the Nordic countries .

ddorian43 8y ago
What do you see there ? Women date down or equal ?
raducu 8y ago
If I remember correctly 23% of norwegian males under 40 are childless while only 13% of females are childless. And that is for having children; I'm sure in the "casual dating"/monopolising the most fertile/attractive years of women the top males have it much better.
- aluren 8y ago
  I don't get it. You can't "monopolize" anyone as far as casual encounters are concerned, since they're by definition 'casual', i.e. temporary, non-exclusive, short-term, etc. Or are you implying that each man in that supposed top 10% has literally eight women waiting in line for him and abstaining from any other kind of encounter? That's a quite bold statement and not one I've verified from personal experience. But then I don't live in America?
- TheCoelacanth 8y ago
  I would guess that is an extremely low difference compared to historic norms. 8,000 years ago, women were 17 times as likely to have children[1], your example would be about 1.13 times as likely. [1] https://psmag.com/environment/17-to-1-reproductive-success https://psmag.com/environment/17-to-1-reproductive-success

meowface 8y ago

Are you saying 80% or more of women don't want monogamous relationships?

ddorian43 8y ago
They will go for several rides with beautiful/wealthy men until they settle down for a normal joe full of resentment.
raducu 8y ago
I think he's saying 80% of women want monogamous relationships with the top 10% of men :)
- radiantswirl 8y ago
  No, he’s saying 100% of women want relationships with the top 10% of men. Because that’s just reality

TheCoelacanth 8y ago

Historically, it has been the opposite. Polygamy has usually coincided with extreme inequality.