> Am I missing a more reasonable interpretation? I think so. I think in more than one way. GP, if I read correctly, tries to limit the expectations we can hav

> Am I missing a more reasonable interpretation? I think so. I think in more than one way. GP, if I read correctly, tries to limit the expectations we can have based on this ruling since the circumstances where unusual. (Read GPs post again for more details.) English is not my first language but GP seemed very clear and easy to read.