3 ms·
I've been using SPF in my SpamAssassin rules for over 10 years now and it has only ever been a good thing. score SPF_FAIL 0 0.919 0 0.919
by zlynx 8y ago
I've been using SPF in my SpamAssassin rules for over 10 years now and it has only ever been a good thing.
score SPF_FAIL 0 0.919 0 0.919
- n3storm 8y agoThat is not exactly how SPF was meant to use. If it fails email should be rejected not scored. Disclaimer: I do the same as you.
- nailer 8y agoSo the developer of SPF (see jedberg above) says it should be used as a ranking factor, but SPF itself says it should be rejected? Maybe the issue with SPF is in the messaging around it?
- LambdaComplex 8y agoI think that would depend on whether the SPF record indicated soft-fail or hard-fail, no?