3 ms·
It's sad to see this as top comment. Banks have low funds, so you force the public to return their own cash. That doesn't solve the underlying problem of NPAs
by dpacmittal 8y ago
It's sad to see this as top comment.
Banks have low funds, so you force the public to return their own cash. That doesn't solve the underlying problem of NPAs and public banks not being managed properly.
Also, FYI, RBI recently reported the cash in circulation right now is more than it was before the demo.
Increase in tax collection is great, but it's due to GST, let's not give credit to demo for that.
Yes it did some good, definitely, but have you seen how bad the situation got. I'm not sure if you've lived in a tier 3 city during the demo times but I've seen the plight of people. It was ridiculously stupid to just ban cash in an 80% cash society where majority of the small businesses (who bring in >30% of tax revenue) depend on cash.
People died, lakhs of businesses shut down, multiple factories shut down where they depended on cash to pay daily wages. Lakhs of jobs lost. GDP taking a solid 2% dive. So you're saying all this was worth it? Ground realities are very different from what your comment portrays.
- puranjay 8y agoEven in Delhi, cash was extremely difficult to get. I was lucky since a close friend lived in a gated State Bank colony that had its own ATM that few outside knew about. I could withdraw cash easily the day it was filled. Had to lend money to people just so they could buy bread, milk and eggs. It was a common sight to see people lining up outside ATMs at 2 in the night just to withdraw cash they earned through their hard work. If this was meant to solve the "black money" issue, it was akin to using a flamethrower to kill an ant. The collateral damage was way, way too high
- intended 8y agoHow did it do good? If you burnt the house down, and said "look, I killed the rats" would anyone in their right mind tell you "hey you did good?"