I can't now, since my statement would then be false. :) Seriously though, I thought about it, but then I realized that I would probably have to replace the ent

I can't now, since my statement would then be false. :) Seriously though, I thought about it, but then I realized that I would probably have to replace the entire paragraph, since it seems to be a key step in the original author's explanation. Maybe I will replace it anyway, since it can't be a very good explanation if it relies on faulty logic. - Update: Did it. Now I'm contradicting myself. Gotta' love these logic games.