4 ms·
Do you really need 16GB of RAM, more storage and a beefy CPU? For reference, I'm using a 12-inch MacBook with a dual-core M3 processor and 8 GB of RAM as my dai
by Rjevski 8y ago
Do you really need 16GB of RAM, more storage and a beefy CPU? For reference, I'm using a 12-inch MacBook with a dual-core M3 processor and 8 GB of RAM as my daily driver and it's more than enough; this thing somehow runs IntelliJ and around 5 Docker containers in the background (including Javascript stuff with 1000+ dependencies) and has plenty of resources to spare.
Now I do agree the new MacBooks have a lot of drawbacks (I'm typing this on a keyboard where the "R" key is no longer responding; autocorrect is my saviour) but the time saved not having to tinker with shit in Linux or Windows (and be put to actual, billable work instead) means I can literally buy a new machine every month if needed. Not ideal but for me MacBooks are still the best option at the moment.
- jsjohnst 8y ago> Do you really need 16GB of RAM, more storage and a beefy CPU? Why be so presumptuous? My main computer is a 12 Core Xeon Mac Pro with 128gb RAM and dual high end video cards and I still run into issues needing more horse power (which admittedly AWS/GCP makes mostly easy to consume).
- Rjevski 8y agoI'm just basing this on my own experience where I used to always demand more power (and completely dismissing the new MacBooks and basically anything below 32 GB of RAM) until I realised that actually a low-power machine was perfectly usable for most development work.
- deleted 8y ago[deleted]