16 ms·
It's the sites that shouldn't depend on JS that irritate me. Sites that load completely static content, dynamically. Newspapers where you get a blank layout ins
by gxti 16y ago
It's the sites that shouldn't depend on JS that irritate me. Sites that load completely static content, dynamically. Newspapers where you get a blank layout instead of an article. They're more common than you think. I don't mind temporarily whitelisting a site to play with some cool thing but if it's something that shouldn't require javascript at all, let alone need to degrade gracefully, I often just go somewhere else.
And then there's sites like this: http://partiallystapled.com/~gxti/trash/2010/10/09-javascript-hell.png http://partiallystapled.com/~gxti/trash/2010/10/09-javascrip...