2 ms·
Your analysis is way too conservative. An analysis by Tesla Motors some time ago calculated that if you drive the Roadster an average of 35 miles a day, you nee
by ph0rque 16y ago
Your analysis is way too conservative. An analysis by Tesla Motors some time ago calculated that if you drive the Roadster an average of 35 miles a day, you need about 105ft^2 of solar panels to produce all the electricity for it, assuming 18%-efficient solar panels. [1]
The Tesla Roadster has an area, when viewed from the top, of 72ft^2. [2] That means if you were able to cover it with solar panels that were 27% efficient, you could power it just from the power it produced.
As far as your last point, I agree: I'd rather put the solar panels on the garage roof, where I can somewhat control how much sunlight it gathers, than on the car.
1. http://www.teslamotors.com/blog/electric-cars-and-photovoltaic-solar-cells http://www.teslamotors.com/blog/electric-cars-and-photovolta...
2. http://www.netcarshow.com/tesla/2008-roadster/ http://www.netcarshow.com/tesla/2008-roadster/
- jws 16y agoGood numbers in the Tesla Roadster wikipedia introduction. wikipedia: The tesla roadster use 490 kiljoules per kilometer. compute: Our 30 megajoules above will take us 38 miles. Of course I'm still using mythical 100% efficient solar cells on a biggish flat roof and all sunny days, and Tesla used mythical shape hugging solar cells on all of their exposed surfaces. I still think the best solution for a solar powered car is to place your solar cells the south western deserts near LA and pull what power you need from the grid. That way you get a lot more power delivered from your cells.