Good commentary but I wonder if inadvertently you may have been out-of-band in your research. In 'Auditory Response to Pulsed Radiofrequency Energy - Elder (20

Good commentary but I wonder if inadvertently you may have been out-of-band in your research. In 'Auditory Response to Pulsed Radiofrequency Energy - Elder (2003)' URL: http://www.beperkdestraling.org/images/stories/Wetenschap/Tinnitus http://www.beperkdestraling.org/images/stories/Wetenschap/Ti... Auditory_Response_to_Pulsed_radiofrequency_energy.pdf Two salient points crop up: 1) 'The fundamental frequency of RF induced sounds is independent of the frequency of the radiowaves but dependent upon head dimensions.' 2) 'RF hearing has been reported at frequencies ranging from 2.4 to 10 000 MHz (see Table 1). Although Ingalls [1967] mentioned 10 000 MHz as an effective frequency, other investigators found that lower frequencies (8900 and 9500 MHz) at very high exposure levels did not induce RF sounds In Table 2 the experimental frequency range appears to have been 900MHz to 3GHz so C-band at 4 – 8 GHz (7.5 – 3.75 cm) may have be a too short a wavelength to elicit the effect. - but ham radio operators should be worried :-)