2 ms·

> It will come on off much more natural and powerful if when women were written about if they were done so in the same manner as men. Simply write the story "Th

> It will come on off much more natural and powerful if when women were written about if they were done so in the same manner as men. Simply write the story "The code breakers ..." and readers will happily discover the identity of the actors in the book. Both are not mutually exclusive - you can do both.

mbrumlow 8y ago
You can but at the risk of deviding people. And most definitely alienating some people. The the entire men vs women is toxic. Every man can't be held responsible for for what some man did in the past. We are different people and not identified by our gender. The same holds tire doe women. What a man or woman does mentally really should not even be a topic. Making it one will only create sides that people are forced to join. It also brings up a bunch of questions that str not productive to society. Like which group is better ? If you answer either group you now become sexiest. It is just as bad to say women code better than men vs men code better than women. That is where every one of these gender separations of groups lead too. It is toxic and vile. And nobody should support it.
- denzil_correa 8y ago
  Honestly, I can't see your point. The article merely highlights role of women in code breaking which wasn't known in the past. They don't say women were better than men. I don't see anything in the article as men vs women.
  - mbrumlow 8y ago
    I am not talking about th book directly but the notions brought up by parrent post. I am purly talking about about always grndeting the person ehoadr the achivment. I also may have gone off topic a bit. Edit. I am out and about. I probably should not try to convey this stuff from a phone while distracted. My arguments are not directe at the book. But it there was a bullseye it would still be on the board.

2 ms·

> It will come on off much more natural and powerful if when women were written about if they were done so in the same manner as men. Simply write the story "Th

by denzil_correa 8y ago

mbrumlow 8y ago
You can but at the risk of deviding people. And most definitely alienating some people. The the entire men vs women is toxic. Every man can't be held responsible for for what some man did in the past. We are different people and not identified by our gender. The same holds tire doe women. What a man or woman does mentally really should not even be a topic. Making it one will only create sides that people are forced to join. It also brings up a bunch of questions that str not productive to society. Like which group is better ? If you answer either group you now become sexiest. It is just as bad to say women code better than men vs men code better than women. That is where every one of these gender separations of groups lead too. It is toxic and vile. And nobody should support it.
- denzil_correa 8y ago
  Honestly, I can't see your point. The article merely highlights role of women in code breaking which wasn't known in the past. They don't say women were better than men. I don't see anything in the article as men vs women.
  - mbrumlow 8y ago
    I am not talking about th book directly but the notions brought up by parrent post. I am purly talking about about always grndeting the person ehoadr the achivment. I also may have gone off topic a bit. Edit. I am out and about. I probably should not try to convey this stuff from a phone while distracted. My arguments are not directe at the book. But it there was a bullseye it would still be on the board.