You're asking leading questions but they don't really...seem to lead anywhere. You suggested x86 assembly was more useful to learn than ARM or AVR ("AVR or ARM

You're asking leading questions but they don't really...seem to lead anywhere. You suggested x86 assembly was more useful to learn than ARM or AVR ("AVR or ARM assembly are far less handy to know than x86"), but provided no justification for that claim - and yet seem to be extremely demanding on similar claims of others. So what's your situation? Are you claiming that it's typical? The logic of: "desktop CPUs are rarely coded in assembly, embedded CPUs are absolutely everywhere and often coded in assembly, the latter assembly languages are more useful to know" is extremely obvious and straightforward. I can't make sense of your opposition to it, especially since you've given absolutely no substance to back up your contrarian position.