2 ms·
Ahh, that makes sense, thanks! I'd recently asked elsewhere 'I've always wondered is there a good mathematical representation of an algorithm that is useful fo
by kjeetgill 8y ago
Ahh, that makes sense, thanks!
I'd recently asked elsewhere 'I've always wondered is there a good mathematical representation of an algorithm that is useful for algebraic manipulation? Like producing a quicksort from bubble sort.' And got linked this paper [0]. This is only time I've heard the word 'Algoritmics' since that.
Any interesting 'entry level' reads you could send my way?
[0]: http://citeseerx.ist.psu.edu/viewdoc/download?doi=10.1.1.45.2247&rep=rep1&type=pdf http://citeseerx.ist.psu.edu/viewdoc/download?doi=10.1.1.45....
- lorenzhs 8y agoThanks for the link, that was fun to read (well, skim). I don't think the term 'algorithmics' appears very often in publications, it's more of an umbrella term for many things. The stuff we work in our group is sort of the practical side of theoretical computer science, in that our focus is on algorithms that can be efficiently implemented and don't just look good on paper. The methodology is called Algorithm Engineering, it's described quite well in https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Algorithm_engineering https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Algorithm_engineering. Apart from ESA's track B, the major conferences there are Alenex and SEA (Symposium on Experimental Algorithms). All three are open access. It's difficult to recommend anything in particular, not only because the scope is very broad, but also because most papers aren't written for a wide audience. Good writing is not something that academics optimize for (perversely, good writing can be seen as a negative point, in that if a paper is easy to understand, it may be rejected for being too simple), nor is it taught. Maybe something like https://github.com/papers-we-love/papers-we-love https://github.com/papers-we-love/papers-we-love could serve as a starting point?