I was going to say this headline seems geared to mislead. But really it's the existence of the article itself. Apparently there was a recent vote about replaci

I was going to say this headline seems geared to mislead. But really it's the existence of the article itself. Apparently there was a recent vote about replacing Musk as chairman. The vote was overwhelmingly defeated with more than 83% voting to keep Musk. Instead of running an article on this Reuters seemingly chose to run an article highlighting a seemingly random minority holder voting for the replacement, with the result mentioned as a numeric aside. This feels like Spin.