3 ms·
How about: we have achieved the right work-life balance now with ~40 hours a week as a species, a balance that allows us to be most creative. We don't work to s
by mojuba 8y ago
How about: we have achieved the right work-life balance now with ~40 hours a week as a species, a balance that allows us to be most creative. We don't work to survive anymore (with the universal basic income on the horizon), we work to show off our creativity. Take artists as an example, they don't reduce their work load just because they can. I'm not even sure who spends more time at work: a startup engineer or a [successful] musician.
So no, we'll always need room for creativity and show-off, whatever it takes, be it 40, 80, or 30 hours per week on average throughout a year. And no, it's not going to converge to 0 because it would mean pretty much the end of the evolutionary path for our species.
- majewsky 8y agoYou're making it sound as though people are only allowed to be creative during work hours. I'm working 70% (28 hours a week) by choice because it leaves me ample room to be creative outside of work hours, on my own projects, outside of the logic of profit maximization.