4 ms·
The title sounds like it killed the work ethic of his employees, but a quote from the interview makes it rather sound like it killed his work ethic: > It creat
by Dunedan 8y ago
The title sounds like it killed the work ethic of his employees, but a quote from the interview makes it rather sound like it killed his work ethic:
> It created this lack of work ethic in me that was fundamentally detrimental to the business and to our mission […]
I'd really like to know what he means by "lack of work ethic" and why he thinks a 32 hour week contributed to that.
- radoslawc 8y agoExactly, I'm also not sure what's the problem. CEO had problem with 'work ethic' (and I'd like to see explanation what that means) and brought back five-days-a-week working scheme for all his employees? Or am I getting it wrong?
- jspash 8y agoSurely the level of “work ethic” is something you have and it doesn’t change based on the number of hours you spend exercising that. Say for instance he had an ethic score of 95% - whatever that is - wouldn’t he apply that same drive for 35 hours and simply get more done? I think the title needs to be less click-baity.