3 ms·
> You yourself linked the article that I'm referring to, and you mentioned it originally. I haven't linked to any article like what you're referring to, nor di
by Someone1234 8y ago
> You yourself linked the article that I'm referring to, and you mentioned it originally.
I haven't linked to any article like what you're referring to, nor did I reference it. I linked to the pilot's original mission report, I also referenced the same report. You seem to be attacking some editorial, and since you haven't linked it, nobody knows which one.
> And I am informed on the F-35 and don't think it's wonderful, but I don't think it's a horrible piece of garbage, either.
Nobody was claiming it was a "horrible piece of garbage."
- engi_nerd 8y agohttps://medium.com/war-is-boring/read-for-yourself-the-f-35-s-damning-dogfighting-report-719a4e66f3eb https://medium.com/war-is-boring/read-for-yourself-the-f-35-... You linked to this yourself.
- Someone1234 8y agoExactly. Which is nothing but the pilot's report un-editorialized. You've been attacking some strawman editorial all throughout this thread that nobody linked or referenced here.
- engi_nerd 8y agoI've been replying to you, not attacking some strawman editorial, as you put it. David Axe, the guy you linked to, has a long history of misunderstanding the F-35, like also, this piece. https://medium.com/war-is-boring/test-pilot-admits-the-f-35-can-t-dogfight-cdb9d11a875 https://medium.com/war-is-boring/test-pilot-admits-the-f-35-... You described that this was "covered up". You would have only gotten that idea if you read the piece I just linked to.
- Someone1234 8y agoGlad you finally linked it, that only took almost ten posts. But no, I've never read that.
- engi_nerd 8y agoSo why do you think this was covered up?