Because none of the things said actually refute any of the points in the Google discussion? At all? I also definitely don't feel a failure to go off and survey

Because none of the things said actually refute any of the points in the Google discussion? At all? I also definitely don't feel a failure to go off and survey every random library that exists for rust makes a discussion "woefully incomplete" or that it isn't debating rust at it's strongest. The same treatment is given to all languages, including rust, go, etc. The discussion is also about language features, and it discusses the language features.