6 ms·
The thing that tipped it over for me was the Multi-Container Tabs[0] Mozilla extension. Aside from being a fantastic privacy and security tool, it is also wonde
by Someone1234 8y ago
The thing that tipped it over for me was the Multi-Container Tabs[0] Mozilla extension. Aside from being a fantastic privacy and security tool, it is also wonderful for development.
[0] https://addons.mozilla.org/en-US/firefox/addon/multi-account-containers/ https://addons.mozilla.org/en-US/firefox/addon/multi-account...
- sammorrowdrums 8y agoYep, I switched and use that every day.
- mbroshi 8y agoMy favorite hidden feature in Firefox is having multiple profiles[0],[1]. Unlike containers, profiles have separate bookmarks, extensions, etc. I have found profiles even more useful than containers for development. [0] about:profiles (paste into URL bar in Firefox) [1] https://support.mozilla.org/en-US/kb/profile-manager-create-and-remove-firefox-profiles https://support.mozilla.org/en-US/kb/profile-manager-create-...
- javajosh 8y agoThis is a feature of Chrome as well, although it isn't very hidden. https://support.google.com/chrome/answer/2364824 https://support.google.com/chrome/answer/2364824
- some_account 8y agoTry the Temporary Containers plug-in, it's even better. It will automatically remove all site cookies when you close the tab, and can be configured to open all links as a self contained container. Basically every site you visit will be completely isolated - and fully cleaned up afterwards.
- tedmiston 8y agoWhy not just use private windows / incognito for this use case?
- smichel17 8y agoNot GP, but I use the add-on because: 1. I want my history saved locally (private browsing deletes history on close). 2. Private browsing requires a new window; I want to have a private tab. 3. All tabs in a private browsing window share the same cookies, so I can still be tracked* within a session; I want a new container with each new tab. *trivially. I'm well aware that I can still be tracked by fingerprinting, etc, and I have other add-ons to help protect against that.
- tedmiston 8y agoThis looks similar to profile switcher / People menu in Chrome [1]. Chrome's implementation restricts the entire window to belonging to one person, but I use separate windows for this use case already anyway. I'm not sure that I see the use case for the in-between abstraction. Can you selectively enable an add-on / extension for only one container but not others in Firefox with this extension? [1]: https://support.google.com/chrome/answer/2364824 https://support.google.com/chrome/answer/2364824
- mintplant 8y agoProfiles have been a Firefox feature since before Chrome existed, though the UI is tucked away under the 'about:profiles' page.
- Tomte 8y agoI stopped using them when I realized they can switch into a "Facebook" container when I visit Facebook, bit they can't switch back out of it when I subsequently visit another site. This was a common feature request. Has it been implemented, yet?
- Aelius 8y agoThere's an extension which does. https://github.com/stoically/temporary-containers https://github.com/stoically/temporary-containers
- floatingatoll 8y agoSeems high-risk to me: All Facebook needs to do is set up a redirector that isn't at a domain considered "Facebook", and include a tracking ID in the redirector URL, and they'll be able to try and de-anonymize your non-"Facebook" container when your tracker-laden link opens in it.
- jonahhorowitz 8y agoThat's not the current behavior, so I'd say it's been implemented.
- yhager 8y agoThe facebook extension by mozilla solves this: https://blog.mozilla.org/firefox/facebook-container-extension/ https://blog.mozilla.org/firefox/facebook-container-extensio...
- tzs 8y agoDo the different contains each have their own bookmarks and history?
- deleted 8y ago[deleted]