4 ms·
Duoculture might be more accurate. It's pretty white + Asian there in tech. https://diversity.google/annual-report/ https://diversity.google/annual-report/ "I
by ethbro 8y ago
Duoculture might be more accurate. It's pretty white + Asian there in tech.
https://diversity.google/annual-report/ https://diversity.google/annual-report/
"In terms of race and ethnicity (U.S. data only) 2.5% of Google’s workforce is Black; 3.6% is Hispanic/Latinx; 36.3% is Asian; 4.2% is multiracial (two or more races); 0.3% are Native American,Alaska Native, Native Hawaiian or Pacific Islander; and, 53.1% is White."
- lotsofpulp 8y agoWhat is the reasoning behind considering Chinese/Indians/Japenese/Vietnamese/Filipino/Indonesian/Pakistani/Bangladeshi/Thai/Korea/etc as one culture? I wouldn't even categorize "white" as one culture, nor Indian nor Chinese. Perhaps it would more accurate to group people by socioeconomic status or education status?
- lenocinor 8y agoIt's just how they ask the question, I think. The categories are meant to be broad, and I think the question is much more useful for saying which ethnic groups are not represented, not for which groups are. We can't say that many Asian countries are represented properly, but we can definitely say that people from African and South American countries aren't represented properly at Google.