3 ms·
Do you think that there's a substantial difference between "the public is tired of experts" and "the public is tired of experts from fancy organisations getting
by lordgrenville 8y ago
Do you think that there's a substantial difference between "the public is tired of experts" and "the public is tired of experts from fancy organisations getting things wrong"? Sincerely asking - I think the context helps, but the short version doesn't seem like a misrepresentation of the main idea.
- coldtea 8y agoYes, there is. One is made to look like you don't want "experts" in general, e.g. because you're anti-science or whatever. You might not even want an expert doctor, but instead e.g. pray. The second is about not wanting BS experts (analysts, media pundits, economists) on the payroll of some "fancy organization", that have a track record of being wrong.
- lordgrenville 8y agoOK, that is helpful. Thanks!
- kamaal 8y agoAnti-Intellectualism has become a thing Offlate. Brexit, rise of Trump, Modi etc. Its the old classic thing of people wanting jobs they can't do, and then diluting the job requirements by downplaying the importance of people required to do the job.
- SturgeonsLaw 8y agoI think it makes a difference, particularly when you look at the recent history of European economists promoting policies which have not only been unable to solve the problems they're facing, but have prolonged them (austerity measures, I'm looking at you).
- Vinnl 8y agoYes. One sounds like being anti-people-who-know-it-better, just because they disagree with you, the other is being anti-people-we-usually-listen-to-but-who-don't-actually-know-it-better. The former would be dumb, the second is completely understandable. Of course, the question is to what extent it is true that experts don't know better, but I'd prefer being wrong due to misinformation than due to sheer dumbness.