I'm not saying the current state of affairs is reasonable (i.e. I'm saying that ISPs are currently monopolies). I'm saying that the FTC's proposed definition to

I'm not saying the current state of affairs is reasonable (i.e. I'm saying that ISPs are currently monopolies). I'm saying that the FTC's proposed definition to determine whether there is competition in a coverage area is reasonable. One heuristic I'm using to support my claim is that the FTC's proposed definition implies there is still an ISP monopoly in the area in the picture I linked.