> author choose to paint Magnetic as better alternative to Flash (in capacity dimension) I'm having trouble finding where in the article that occurred. To me,

> author choose to paint Magnetic as better alternative to Flash (in capacity dimension) I'm having trouble finding where in the article that occurred. To me, it seemed to ignore flash/SSD, as the principle premise was that tape survives due to its low cost (at scale), so only the highest-density HDDs were mentioned.