> have to somehow manipulate Now I fear you're just putting words in my mouth, and certainly not responding to the strongest possible reading of my comment. R

> have to somehow manipulate Now I fear you're just putting words in my mouth, and certainly not responding to the strongest possible reading of my comment. Regardless, the implication that any domestic animal can have a diet that is not manipulated in the first place, stretches credibility. > Could you imagine if the toilet required you to eat a certain diet? Let's use a more accurate analogy, of a toilet that requires I not eat a certain diet, but where the vast majority of other diets, including an overall healthier one, are acceptable. I don't need to imagine. That's all low-flow toilets and a low-fiber diet.