4 ms·
This doesn't directly answer your question, but there is some silliness in the way some large companies hire contractors that typically prevents an individual c
by apohn 8y ago
This doesn't directly answer your question, but there is some silliness in the way some large companies hire contractors that typically prevents an individual contractor from making more (including benefits) than an employee. I know somebody who was able to work around this that I'll describe at the end of the post.
Many companies prefer to hire contractors through agencies they trust or professional services companies. Sometimes this is just baked into HR policy so you can't hire an individual contractor even if you want to. I used to work for a services company that charged customers ~$225/hr for US based people with specialized expertise in a certain area. The employees would get less than 50% of that in salary, but it probably came to 50-60% of that if you added in benefits.
Note that "specialized expertise" is really broad and many customers were paying premium rates for very average consultants. The customers that really needed experts cycled through a few average consultants before getting a great one.
I've also been at the other end of this, being the person who was hiring through an agency who charged ~$150/hr and paid their actual contractors much less. Again, the quality of the "experts" on their end varied widely.
At those rates, if you paid an individual directly you could get somebody amazing. But none of these companies were willing to do that and directly hire a great person for 75% of what they were paying a firm to do the same (or worse) work.
I knew one person who found a way around this. He was part of a professional services group and was contracted to a large company for 2+ years (multiple short term contracts) and built a bunch of custom stuff for them. He was literally the only person on earth who understood what he had built. He was also really good, so you couldn't replace him easily. He had some family issues and had to quit from the services company to take care of family.
The large company had no choice but to hire him directly as a contractor and give him a lot of leeway in his work schedule so he could take care of his family. He got a great rate and made that work for multiple years. I think the large company wanted to hire him as an employee, but he had no interest in getting pulled into their day-to-day politics.
- ratsimihah 8y ago> He was literally the only person on earth who understood what he had built. This is often not a good sign, i.e. if the code is so messy no one can understand it. But if it's so technically challenging only him can understand, then that's a great position to be in! I guess the tldr of your story is to stay away from these big companies and to work directly for your clients?
- apohn 8y ago>This is often not a good sign, i.e. if the code is so messy no one can understand it. But if it's so technically challenging only him can understand, then that's a great position to be in! What he built required specialized knowledge of a GUI driven product that had a very convoluted C# SDK for developing custom add-ons. So it was less about messy code and more about there being very few people who could understand all 4 aspects (The product, C#, the SDK, and how the SDK related to the GUI). >I guess the tldr of your story is to stay away from these big companies and to work directly for your clients? Yes and No. Sometimes to get paid well as a contractor you need to find other ways to get gigs than finding standard contract recruitment that comes through LinkedIn. In the case of the person I knew, he had basically created an add-on product and was charging hourly for services to maintain and add features.
- twunde 8y agoFor those wondering why HR prefers to pay more for contractors through agencies, the biggest reason is so that they limit the risk of a contractor being labeled retroactively as an employee. The other reason is consolidation. It's one set of paperwork to do instead of 50.