4 ms·
That’s vastly insufficient as far as empirical evidence is concerned. There are many things that coincide with pollution, which is what the commenter is saying.
by throwawaymath 8y ago
That’s vastly insufficient as far as empirical evidence is concerned. There are many things that coincide with pollution, which is what the commenter is saying. You need to demonstrate how you picked out pollution from everything comingled with it. That’s what’s being asked about here.
EDIT: Disregard this stuffy reply, my humor detector was off.
- Vinnl 8y agoThe response was tongue-in-cheek: the commenter implied that the article was insufficient due to the journalist being less intelligent due to living in a polluted city.
- throwawaymath 8y agoHah, I see it now. Shame you had to spell that out for me :)
- murph-almighty 8y agoThe Guardian paradox: if air pollution makes us dumber, how can those who live in air pollution make this discovery?