3 ms·
I think the OP was using "machines" as reinforcement learning (or whatever the best general learning algorithm). It doesn't count if you program a solution for
by daveguy 8y ago
I think the OP was using "machines" as reinforcement learning (or whatever the best general learning algorithm). It doesn't count if you program a solution for each individual game. These are learning algorithm benchmarks not programmer benchmarks.
For generalized reinforcement learning algorithms. Humans almost always beat the "machine". The only cases where machine wins is on 100% hand eye coordination and duration.
All ML algorithms are terrible at figuring out how to plan de-novo. So anything that requires multiple contexts or planning is a fail.
- guskel 8y agoYes, my intent was referring to reinforcement learning algorithms. Writing a handcrafted program to beat an arbitrary Atari game is trivial. Yet on the other hand, it is apparent that reinforcement learning algorithms have surpassed humans in board games such as Go and Chess.