> Except, I'm not arguing for or against a "point", only that the terminology was wrong. The problem is, the terminology is only wrong if you take an extremely

> Except, I'm not arguing for or against a "point", only that the terminology was wrong. The problem is, the terminology is only wrong if you take an extremely narrow approach of "heating" being "generating heat". But it's quite obvious that we are discussing heating of an enclosed space. And it doesn't actually matter at all whether that heat being placed into the closed space was generated from raw energy within the enclosed space, or moved from externally into the enclosed space. And if there is no difference between these two options, you can achieve greater than 100% efficiency between energy-spent and heat-provided by moving the heat.