5 ms·
Well, the standard model can be correct. It is correct until some experiment proves otherwise. It is full of unexplained hadcoded parameters, indeed, which nee
by f137 8y ago
Well, the standard model can be correct. It is correct until some experiment proves otherwise.
It is full of unexplained hadcoded parameters, indeed, which need an explanation from outside of the SM.
- westurner 8y ago> It is full of unexplained hadcoded parameters, indeed, which need an explanation from outside of the SM. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Magic_number_(programming)#Unnamed_numerical_constants https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Magic_number_(programming)#Unn... > The term magic number or magic constant refers to the anti-pattern of using numbers directly in source code
- bradleyjg 8y agoWho is going to request changes when doing a code review on a pull request from God?
- adrianratnapala 8y agoGod doesn't use GitHub. You have to run `git format-patch` and email the results to Him.
- eloff 8y agoYeah him and Torvalds alike, maybe it's an ego thing. Or a graybeard thing?
- dylan604 8y agoBut which branch do you pull from? God has been forked so many times, it's hard to keep track. There are several distros available, so I guess you just get to pick the one that checks the most of your needs at the time.
- dwaltrip 8y agoThe standard model has no conception of gravity, so it is most certainly incomplete, at the very least.