3 ms·

Is that a good thing? Yes, because instead your program won’t compile if you forget to handle an error ( except in the case of a function which only returns er

Is that a good thing? Yes, because instead your program won’t compile if you forget to handle an error ( except in the case of a function which only returns error, which you can ignore by mistake - I would like to see that fixed in go 2 as well).

fwip 8y ago
Expect to see a lot of `_, _ = fmt.Println(...)`, then.
- grey-area 8y ago
  Since they’re calling it go 2 perhaps they could just make an exception for println by having an alternative with no error (like map access with k,ok or just k).