7 ms·
Yep. That article was spouting disingenuous nonsense in the best possible interpretation I could read into it.
by bwanab 8y ago
Yep. That article was spouting disingenuous nonsense in the best possible interpretation I could read into it.
- ska 8y agoI suspect (but don't know) that you can replace "article" with "site" comfortably there...
- elago 8y agoWhat's wrong with that site? I've been listening to the podcast hosted there, Econtalk, for the last year+. Do they have some bias in the grander scheme of economics? The guests and topics always seem extremely varied, and the host actually asks challenging and interactive questions to the guests.
- ska 8y agoNo idea about the podcast, I'll give a listen though based on your comments. My comment was on reviewing a few of the articles, the sloppiness exhibited in this one was common. I guess it's more a preaching-to-the-converted sort of area than trying to do a good job of presenting arguments. Perhaps I didn't give it a fair shake - I'm definitely not one to enjoy watching people grinding their favorite axes, particularly if they are uncharitable to other viewpoints while simultaneously presenting their own assumptions as canon.