> That article is incredibly biased. Precisely because it's run by Chu's consulting company, I cannot trust them when they describe 389DS as "a less-capable LDA

> That article is incredibly biased. Precisely because it's run by Chu's consulting company, I cannot trust them when they describe 389DS as "a less-capable LDAP server". The article says: "This is a guest post from Univention." Howard Chu's company is Symas, not Univention (a different consulting company who does provide support contracts for open-source software including OpenLDAP). Yes, there is a link to a blog post by Symas that relates to the announcement, but not in the article being discussed here. If you meant the Symas blog post, you should be more clear on that.