> The internet exists, is way to big to manually curate, and google is just providing a window into it with algorithmic searches. You're assuming that because

> The internet exists, is way to big to manually curate, and google is just providing a window into it with algorithmic searches. You're assuming that because they can't do it, they won't. You forget that these people are making the laws. They can just vote a law that "the internet must be curated, and uphold standards X and Y". Then they simply force providers to block anything that isn't perfectly curated at the simple request to a court. Done/done. So they can simply force others to do it. They can simply force self-censorship (see GPDR, and why that law is such a horrible thing). Congress can't check food for safety, so they make others do it (e.g. the FDA doesn't check food safety (except where it has already gone wrong), it forces vendors to check it, then does a basic sanity check on the report of said check, same is true in Europe, except for the name of the organization).