And here you're forgetting about the significance of the patterns themselves. 95% significance of the fact that no women or ex convicts were hired for the job?

And here you're forgetting about the significance of the patterns themselves. 95% significance of the fact that no women or ex convicts were hired for the job? Seems significant enough that a newspaper would write about it. 95% significance of not hiring a guy who looking too much of a hipster and has too many tattoos? Not sure, to be honest - I can see how society (and newspaper writers) would easily dismiss that as bs. Don't try to abstract it away as otherwise it just seems you're justifying something absolutely ridiculous.