3 ms·
Its kind of ridiculous that in this industry we are expected to jump on new trends every couple of years to stay current, rather than learn how to use the tools
by collyw 8y ago
Its kind of ridiculous that in this industry we are expected to jump on new trends every couple of years to stay current, rather than learn how to use the tools that we do have well. Sure we get some benefits, but 90 % of the time it seems we are just chasing fads.
(Yes is my answer to the question).
- irq11 8y agoThis is the only correct response. I’ve been doing this a long time, and it’s demotivating to see every new generation of noob developer turn their nose up at the work of the generations before. It’s not as if Rails has stagnated - it keeps getting better with every release. You could be excused for wanting to switch from Java servlets and PHP apps back in the day, because the Rails dev experience was that much better. But all of this Javascript crap is just re-writing for the sake of re-writing. And it happened so quickly - not even six years ago, Rails was the obvious choice for a new web app. Technologically, what has changed since then? Very little. People unironically ask if Rails is “still relevant”, and then switch back to their (hideously slow, JS-based) editor to grind out spaghetti code in node, not even stopping to wonder why their NPM dependency tree has sixteen different versions of the same json module. Such a waste.
- joelbluminator 8y agoThat happens mostly in front end, backend world moves slower. It's why I just don't like front end coding anymore, I feel like I have better use of my time than learning a new framework every 3 years.
- collyw 8y agoFront end is way worse, but a few years ago we were all told to jump on the Mongo bandwagon. Now we have serverless. Sue these things do have use cases but they are oversold a lot of the time.
- bdcravens 8y agoIf you ever want to play "shock a hipster" tell them when the underlying language came out that their framework depends on.
- drish 8y agoaccurate.