3 ms·
Because it’s the Daily Mail, and I wouldn’t believe anything you see in it. They run articles on whether wife-swapping yetis are parking their UFOs properly, an
by madaxe_again 8y ago
Because it’s the Daily Mail, and I wouldn’t believe anything you see in it. They run articles on whether wife-swapping yetis are parking their UFOs properly, and if not, why not. They make the National Enquirer look deadly serious.
Here are some better resources on the topic.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Beard_tax https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Beard_tax
https://www.smithsonianmag.com/smart-news/why-tsar-peter-great-established-beard-tax-180964693/ https://www.smithsonianmag.com/smart-news/why-tsar-peter-gre...
https://www.atlasobscura.com/articles/a-beard-tax-is-being-proposed-in-england-and-its-not-the-first https://www.atlasobscura.com/articles/a-beard-tax-is-being-p...
- mirimir 8y agoYeah, got that. Those links on the right always blow my mind ;) I was wondering about a date definition or formatting screwup. But with a little playing around, nothing made sense.
- gdfasfklshg4 8y ago> Because it’s the Daily Mail, and I wouldn’t believe anything you see in it. They run articles on whether wife-swapping yetis are parking their UFOs properly, and if not, why not. They make the National Enquirer look deadly serious. I am not a fan of the Daily Mail. Having said that, can you provide a reference for your claim that they run articles "on whether wife-swapping yetis are parking their UFOs properly, and if not, why not."?
- empath75 8y agohttps://www.google.com/amp/www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-6035613/amp/Discovery-Channel-treasure-hunter-claims-hes-evidence-extra-terrestrial-visit.html https://www.google.com/amp/www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-... Not exactly but...