> I struggle with how to say "both Ruby and Rails are poor technology choices" without sounding ranty Probably because you offer no evidence whatsoever, a typi

> I struggle with how to say "both Ruby and Rails are poor technology choices" without sounding ranty Probably because you offer no evidence whatsoever, a typical characteristic of rants? I could entertain an argument that Rails is a poor technology choice. It certainly makes it easy to shoot yourself in the foot without sufficient experience, despite that being a conscious tradeoff towards ease of learning. But Ruby? What, precisely, is wrong with Ruby?