> The "unproductive" courses (aka everything but STEM) will all be eliminated as there isn't money for them. 1) So most people doing accounting, economics, his

> The "unproductive" courses (aka everything but STEM) will all be eliminated as there isn't money for them. 1) So most people doing accounting, economics, history, design, law, journalism, marketing, philosophy etc dont get jobs? 2) This is assuming universities will specialise to the most profitable vs being self funded. 3) This assumes that universities wont value lower returning education disciplines enough to cross subsidise areas they feel are important vs 'most profitable' .... so I dont doubt there would be issues in this funding model but cant see too much STEM focus being one of them.